Home About Browse Search

Occupational injuries and communications in Swedish agriculture safety interventions

Alwall Svennefelt, Catharina (2019). Occupational injuries and communications in Swedish agriculture safety interventions. Diss. (sammanfattning/summary) Alnarp : Sveriges lantbruksuniv., Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae, 1652-6880 ; 2019:50
ISBN 978-91-7760-418-1
eISBN 978-91-7760-419-8
[Doctoral thesis]

[img] PDF


Systemic changes in Swedish agriculture have seen the average farm size increase, employees become more common, adoption of new technologies and an ageing farm population. This has led to many new physical and psychological health risks and the need for continued work in preventing occupational injuries. To date, education has been the main tool (in terms of total spending) used by stakeholders to influence work safety behaviour. However, this approach has been criticised by occupational safety experts for being inefficient, if not largely ineffective. It is often unclear whether the education tool itself or its implementation is the problem. Given the need to improve safety at work within agriculture and identify the mechanisms underlying intervention outcomes, this thesis explored work safety interventions in Sweden and sought to develop a deeper understanding of how motivation can be used to effect behavioural change and the underlying cognitive factors promoting or hindering these changes. Over a six-year period, four studies were carried out using mixed methods and covering topics such as occupational safety intervention implementation, outcomes, fear appeals and cognitive mediation processes. The results confirmed that there is marked under-reporting of occupational injuries in Sweden. More importantly, they showed that, despite substantial efforts to reduce occupational injuries, on taking into account the reduced labour demand in agriculture and the decline in the number of farms since 2004, the rate of occupational injuries has not significantly decreased. Fear appeals were found to be the most common motivational tool used by the largest organisations in Sweden to influence work safety behaviours. Use of an extended parallel processing model (EPPM) to describe and evaluate marketing communications revealed a mismatch between the types of threats used in communications and the behaviours promoted. Contradictory evidence was also found. On the one hand, some farmers interviewed seemed to be aware of the most common threats in their environment and nearly all had made at least some changes to their work safety environment (crediting an intervention that took place one year earlier), indicating that the intervention had worked in terms of generating awareness and stimulating adaptive behaviours. On the other hand, many of the same farmers who had made adaptive changes also showed clear signs of maladaptation. These insights can be applied to address the communication motivation and cognitive challenges in safety interventions in Swedish agriculture.

Authors/Creators:Alwall Svennefelt, Catharina
Title:Occupational injuries and communications in Swedish agriculture safety interventions
Series Name/Journal:Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Sueciae
Year of publishing :2019
Number of Pages:97
IAlwall Svennefelt, C. & Lundqvist, P. (2019). “Safe Farmers’ Common Sense”, a national 5-year education-based program for prevention of occupational injuries in Swedish agriculture – background, process and evaluation. Submitted.
IIPinzke, S., Alwall Svennefelt, C. & Lundqvist, P. (2018). Occupational injuries in Swedish agriculture: Development and preventive actions. Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health 24(4), 193-2011.
IIIAlwall Svennefelt, C., Hunter, E. & Palsdottir, A.M. (2019). Work safety interventions and threat complexity: A formative investigation into why farmers don’t act safely. Published online in Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine
IVAlwall Svennefelt, C., Hunter, E. & Lundqvist, P. (2018). Evaluating the Swedish approach to motivating improved work safety conditions on farms: Insights from fear appeals and the extended parallel processing model. Journal of Agromedicine 23(4), 355-373.
Place of Publication:Alnarp
Publisher:Department of Work Science, Business Economics and Environmental Phychology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
ISBN for printed version:978-91-7760-418-1
ISBN for electronic version:978-91-7760-419-8
Publication Type:Doctoral thesis
Article category:Scientific peer reviewed
Full Text Status:Public
Agris subject categories.:X Agricola extesions > X38 Human medicine, health, and safety
X Agricola extesions > X70 Economics and management
Subjects:(A) Swedish standard research categories 2011 > 4 Agricultural Sciences > 405 Other Agricultural Sciences > Agricultural Occupational Health and Safety
(A) Swedish standard research categories 2011 > 5 Social Sciences > 508 Media and Communications > Human Aspects of ICT
(A) Swedish standard research categories 2011 > 5 Social Sciences > 503 Educational Sciences > Learning
Keywords:agriculture, farmer, injury prevention, injury statistics, occupational injuries, safety intervention program, Safe Farmers Common Sense, marketing communications, fear appeals, extended parallel processing model, cognitive mediation process
Permanent URL:
ID Code:16157
Faculty:LTV - Fakulteten för landskapsarkitektur, trädgårds- och växtproduktionsvetenskap
Department:(LTJ, LTV) > Department of Work Science, Business Economics, and Environmental Psychology (until 2020)
Deposited By: SLUpub Connector
Deposited On:21 May 2019 14:38
Metadata Last Modified:15 Jan 2020 03:44

Repository Staff Only: item control page


Downloads per year (since September 2012)

View more statistics