Home About Browse Search
Svenska


Woodpecker cavity establishment in managed forests: relative rather than absolute tree size matters

Basile, Marco and Asbeck, Thomas and Pacioni, Cesare and Mikusinski, Grzegorz and Storch, Ilse (2020). Woodpecker cavity establishment in managed forests: relative rather than absolute tree size matters. Wildlife Biology. 2020 , wlb.00564 , 1-10
[Journal article]

[img] PDF
1MB

Abstract

What kind of tree should be preserved from logging for biodiversity conservation is a matter of debate. Large and old trees are potential candidates due to the structures they can bear, like cavities and other tree-related microhabitats (TreMs). One of the most studied TreM is woodpecker-made cavities, which, in addition to be breeding sites for primary cavity-nesters, are often the main breeding sites for secondary cavity-nesters, especially in managed forests. Therefore, understanding which trees woodpeckers select for cavities is relevant to forest management, especially in management regimes where individual trees are logged or spared, as in retention forestry. We used data from a forest inventory, TreM inventory and woodpecker counts in one-hectare plots in the Black Forest (southwest Germany) to investigate which features make a retention tree suitable for woodpeckers. By employing a resource selection probability function, we tested several variables for their influence on the probability of tree choice by woodpeckers including altitude, tree species, TreM richness and abundance, diameter at breast height (DBH) and deviation from the mean DBH per plot. The results show that the probability of selection by woodpeckers does not correlate with individual tree diameter. Instead, the probability is driven mainly by the deviation from the mean DBH per plot. We were able to identify a relative size for the selection of trees indicating that woodpeckers prefer trees that are about 15-20cm larger than the mean DBH per plot. Thereby, we argue, that using absolute diameter thresholds to select retention might not be the best management solution in the short-term, as in managed forests woodpeckers might select sub-optimal trees. Apparently, more knowledge concerning relative thresholds, as detected in our study, is required to improve our understanding of the potential ecological value of retention trees.

Authors/Creators:Basile, Marco and Asbeck, Thomas and Pacioni, Cesare and Mikusinski, Grzegorz and Storch, Ilse
Title:Woodpecker cavity establishment in managed forests: relative rather than absolute tree size matters
Year of publishing :2020
Volume:2020
Article number:wlb.00564
Number of Pages:9
Publisher:WILDLIFE BIOLOGY
ISSN:0909-6396
Language:English
Publication Type:Journal article
Article category:Scientific peer reviewed
Version:Published version
Copyright:Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Full Text Status:Public
Subjects:(A) Swedish standard research categories 2011 > 4 Agricultural Sciences > 401 Agricultural, Forestry and Fisheries > Forest Science
(A) Swedish standard research categories 2011 > 1 Natural sciences > 106 Biological Sciences (Medical to be 3 and Agricultural to be 4) > Ecology
Keywords:hole nesters, large trees, nest site selection, retention forestry, tree-related microhabitats
URN:NBN:urn:nbn:se:slu:epsilon-p-107093
Permanent URL:
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:slu:epsilon-p-107093
Additional ID:
Type of IDID
DOI10.2981/wlb.00564
Web of Science (WoS)000535259200003
ID Code:17420
Faculty:S - Faculty of Forest Sciences
Department:(NL, NJ) > Dept. of Ecology
(S) > Dept. of Ecology
Deposited By: SLUpub Connector
Deposited On:07 Sep 2020 09:49
Metadata Last Modified:07 Sep 2020 09:49

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads

Downloads per year (since September 2012)

View more statistics

Downloads
Hits