Home About Browse Search
Svenska


Environmental compensation for biodiversity and ecosystem services: A flexible framework that addresses human wellbeing

Cole, Scott and Moksnes, Per-Olav and Söderqvist, Tore and Wikstrom, Sofia A. and Sundblad, Göran and Hasselstrom, Linus and Bergström, Ulf and Kraufvelin, Patrik and Bergström, Lena (2021). Environmental compensation for biodiversity and ecosystem services: A flexible framework that addresses human wellbeing. Ecosystem Services. 50 , 101319
[Research article]

[img] PDF
3MB

Abstract

Environmental compensation should address negative impacts from human activities on nature, including loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services. However, successful compensation, achieving no net loss, requires broad quantitative information on different types of losses and gains. We find that the scope of compensatory schemes varies in what is considered compensable, which makes it challenging to apply a conceptual approach consistently across schemes with different needs. We propose a flexible yet structured framework for determining which values should be compensated and how. Our framework focuses specifically on habitat deterioration and is illustrated with a case study involving loss of eelgrass habitat. The framework helps identify compensation needs and selects among suitable compensation options, merging science-based information with normative issues and local concerns. By integrating the ecosystem services cascade model, it encompasses aspects from biodiversity structure to human wellbeing. The framework prefers in-kind compensation because this targets the structure level and thus meets compensation needs in all subsequent levels of the cascade model; further, it is more likely to capture non-instrumental values (i.e. in nature) and reduce exposure to uncertainty. We highlight the importance of spatial aspects of ecosystem functions, services and their subsequent impacts on wellbeing. Although our selection hierarchy assumes a "similar and nearby" principle for habitat restoration (preference for in-kind/on-site), this criterion is not universal. We underscore the hierarchy's implicit normative assumptions and suggest that apparent disagreement about who should benefit may be traced to an unresolved conflict between egalitarianism and utilitarianism.

Authors/Creators:Cole, Scott and Moksnes, Per-Olav and Söderqvist, Tore and Wikstrom, Sofia A. and Sundblad, Göran and Hasselstrom, Linus and Bergström, Ulf and Kraufvelin, Patrik and Bergström, Lena
Title:Environmental compensation for biodiversity and ecosystem services: A flexible framework that addresses human wellbeing
Series Name/Journal:Ecosystem Services
Year of publishing :2021
Volume:50
Article number:101319
Number of Pages:15
Publisher:ELSEVIER
ISSN:2212-0416
Language:English
Publication Type:Research article
Article category:Scientific peer reviewed
Version:Published version
Copyright:Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Full Text Status:Public
Subjects:(A) Swedish standard research categories 2011 > 5 Social Sciences > 502 Economics and Business > Economics
Keywords:Biodiversity offset, Cascade model, Instrumental values, Coastal habitat, Deterioration, Habitat loss
URN:NBN:urn:nbn:se:slu:epsilon-p-113286
Permanent URL:
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:slu:epsilon-p-113286
Additional ID:
Type of IDID
DOI10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101319
Web of Science (WoS)000679918800003
ID Code:25148
Faculty:NJ - Fakulteten för naturresurser och jordbruksvetenskap
Department:(NL, NJ) > Department of Aquatic Resources
Deposited By: SLUpub Connector
Deposited On:02 Sep 2021 07:25
Metadata Last Modified:02 Sep 2021 07:31

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads

Downloads per year (since September 2012)

View more statistics

Downloads
Hits