Home About Browse Search
Svenska


On the need for rigorous welfare and methodological reporting for the live capture of large carnivores: A response to de Araujo et al. (2021)

Caravaggi, Anthony and Amado, Talita F. and Brook, Ryan K. and Ciuti, Simone and Darimont, Chris T. and Drouilly, Marine and English, Holly M. and Field, Kate A. and Iossa, Graziella and Martin, Jessica E. and McElligott, Alan G. and Mohammadi, Alireza and Nayeri, Danial and O'Neill, Helen M. K. and Paquet, Paul C. and Periquet, Stephanie and Proulx, Gilbert and Rabaiotti, Daniella and Rodriguez Recio, Mariano and Soulsbury, Carl D. and Tadich, Tamara and Wynn-Grant, Rae (2021). On the need for rigorous welfare and methodological reporting for the live capture of large carnivores: A response to de Araujo et al. (2021). Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 12 , 1793-1799
[Research article]

[img] PDF
684kB

Abstract

De Araujo et al. (Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 2021, ) described the development and application of a wire foot snare trap for the capture of jaguars Panthera onca and cougars Puma concolor. Snares are a commonly used and effective means of studying large carnivores. However, the article presented insufficient information to replicate the work and inadequate consideration and description of animal welfare considerations, thereby risking the perpetuation of poor standards of reporting. Appropriate animal welfare assessments are essential in studies that collect data from animals, especially those that use invasive techniques, and are key in assisting researchers to choose the most appropriate capture method. It is critical that authors detail all possible associated harms and benefits to support thorough review, including equipment composition, intervention processes, general body assessments, injuries (i.e. cause, type, severity) and post-release behaviour. We offer a detailed discussion of these shortcomings. We also discuss broader but highly relevant issues, including the capture of non-target animals and the omission of key methodological details. The level of detail provided by authors should allow the method to be properly assessed and replicated, including those that improve trap selectivity and minimize or eliminate the capture of non-target animals. Finally, we discuss the central role that journals must play in ensuring that published research conforms to ethical, animal welfare and reporting standards. Scientific studies are subject to ever-increasing scrutiny by peers and the public, making it more important than ever that standards are upheld and reviewed. We conclude that the proposal of a new or refined method must be supported by substantial contextual discussion, a robust rationale and analyses and comprehensive documentation.

Authors/Creators:Caravaggi, Anthony and Amado, Talita F. and Brook, Ryan K. and Ciuti, Simone and Darimont, Chris T. and Drouilly, Marine and English, Holly M. and Field, Kate A. and Iossa, Graziella and Martin, Jessica E. and McElligott, Alan G. and Mohammadi, Alireza and Nayeri, Danial and O'Neill, Helen M. K. and Paquet, Paul C. and Periquet, Stephanie and Proulx, Gilbert and Rabaiotti, Daniella and Rodriguez Recio, Mariano and Soulsbury, Carl D. and Tadich, Tamara and Wynn-Grant, Rae
Title:On the need for rigorous welfare and methodological reporting for the live capture of large carnivores: A response to de Araujo et al. (2021)
Series Name/Journal:Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Year of publishing :2021
Volume:12
Page range:1793-1799
Number of Pages:7
Publisher:WILEY
Language:English
Publication Type:Research article
Article category:Scientific peer reviewed
Version:Published version
Copyright:Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
Full Text Status:Public
Subjects:(A) Swedish standard research categories 2011 > 1 Natural sciences > 106 Biological Sciences (Medical to be 3 and Agricultural to be 4) > Ecology
Keywords:analysis, animal welfare, large carnivores, live capture, methods, peer-review
URN:NBN:urn:nbn:se:slu:epsilon-p-113974
Permanent URL:
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:slu:epsilon-p-113974
Additional ID:
Type of IDID
DOI10.1111/2041-210X.13664
Web of Science (WoS)000703617900005
ID Code:25668
Faculty:NJ - Fakulteten för naturresurser och jordbruksvetenskap
Department:(NL, NJ) > Dept. of Ecology
(S) > Dept. of Ecology
Deposited By: SLUpub Connector
Deposited On:15 Oct 2021 01:25
Metadata Last Modified:15 Oct 2021 05:01

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads

Downloads per year (since September 2012)

View more statistics

Downloads
Hits