Home About Browse Search
Svenska


How stable are visions for protected area management? Stakeholder perspectives before and during a pandemic

Lo, Veronica and Lopez-Rodriguez, Maria D. and Metzger, Marc J. and Oteros-Rozas, Elisa and Cebrian-Piqueras, Miguel A. and Ruiz-Mallen, Isabel and March, Hug and Raymond, Christopher (2022). How stable are visions for protected area management? Stakeholder perspectives before and during a pandemic. People and Nature. 4 :2 , 445-461
[Research article]

[img] PDF
2MB

Abstract

Envisioning processes enable protected area managers to chart a course for future management to reach desired goals, but unexpected changes that could affect future visions are not usually considered. The global COVID-19 pandemic provided an opportunity to explore changes in stakeholder visions, the values that underpin the visions, and their perceptions of landscape changes and the underlying drivers (e.g. climate change, mass tourism and demographic trends).Through a mixed-methods approach in this post-evaluation study, we gathered comparative data on these issues from stakeholders in the Sierra de Guadarrama National Park, Spain, between July 2019 (pre-pandemic) and October 2020 (mid-pandemic).Our qualitative analysis demonstrates that pre-pandemic, differences in visions for protected area management were largely spurred by different perceptions of drivers of change, rather than differences in values or perceived landscape changes, which were similar across different vision themes.One year later, in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, the majority of stakeholders reported that their values, visions and perceptions of drivers did not change despite this large-scale disturbance. Of the 20%-30% of stakeholders that did report changes, visions generally shifted towards greater prioritization of biodiversity and nature conservation as a result of heightened perceptions of the impacts of drivers of change associated with an increase in the numbers of park visitors. These drivers included mass tourism, mountain recreation, lack of environmental awareness, and change in values and traditions.Our findings reinforce the importance of adaptive and inclusive management of protected areas, including enhancing transparency and communications regarding factors driving change in the landscape, and integration of local and traditional knowledge and stakeholder perceptions of changes and drivers. Furthermore, management plans integrating stakeholder values have the potential to stay relevant even in the face of wildcard events such as a pandemic.To enhance the relevancy of visions and scenarios in conservation and land-use planning, scenario planning methodologies should more strongly consider different potential disturbances and how drivers of change in the near and far future can be affected by wildcard events such as a pandemic. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

Authors/Creators:Lo, Veronica and Lopez-Rodriguez, Maria D. and Metzger, Marc J. and Oteros-Rozas, Elisa and Cebrian-Piqueras, Miguel A. and Ruiz-Mallen, Isabel and March, Hug and Raymond, Christopher
Title:How stable are visions for protected area management? Stakeholder perspectives before and during a pandemic
Series Name/Journal:People and Nature
Year of publishing :2022
Volume:4
Number:2
Page range:445-461
Number of Pages:17
Publisher:WILEY
Language:English
Publication Type:Research article
Article category:Scientific peer reviewed
Version:Published version
Copyright:Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Full Text Status:Public
Subjects:(A) Swedish standard research categories 2011 > 1 Natural sciences > 106 Biological Sciences (Medical to be 3 and Agricultural to be 4) > Ecology
(A) Swedish standard research categories 2011 > 4 Agricultural Sciences > 405 Other Agricultural Sciences > Fish and Wildlife Management
Keywords:biodiversity, futures, pandemic, protected areas, scenario planning, social-ecological systems, stakeholder perceptions, visions
URN:NBN:urn:nbn:se:slu:epsilon-p-116026
Permanent URL:
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:slu:epsilon-p-116026
Additional ID:
Type of IDID
DOI10.1002/pan3.10292
Web of Science (WoS)000745695700001
ID Code:27621
Faculty:LTV - Fakulteten för landskapsarkitektur, trädgårds- och växtproduktionsvetenskap
Department:(LTJ, LTV) > Department of Landscape Architecture, Planning and Management
Deposited By: SLUpub Connector
Deposited On:26 Apr 2022 08:26
Metadata Last Modified:26 Apr 2022 08:31

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Downloads

Downloads per year (since September 2012)

View more statistics

Downloads
Hits