Home About Browse Search

Alternativa bevattningsformer

2. reglering av grundvattennivån

Alinder, Staffan (1986). Alternativa bevattningsformer. Technical Report. Uppsala: (NL, NJ) > Dept. of Soil Sciences (until 081001) > Div. of Hydrotechnics, Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet. Report / Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Soil Sciences, Division of Agricultural Hydrotechnics ; 150

[img] PDF


Subirrigation through regulation of groundwater levels is, in principle, a very favourable form of irrigation. There are, however, some requirements which must be met by the area to be irrigated. The area must have a level surface and little or no slope. The soil must have a relatively high permeability so that an artificial watertable can be created and maintained at a suitable depth below the soi1 surface. So that water consumption can be kept to a reasonable level, the soil must have a dense layer or a naturally high watertable to reduce downward flow of water in the profile. To achieve a maximum irrigation effect, variation in distance between soil surface and watertable should not be greater than 0.1 - 0.5 m (depending on soil type). This usually requires the installation of several weirs. On soils which are suitable for subirrigation, the drain spacing used in conventional drainage is usually satisfactory for subirrigation. Drainage pipes should be surrounded by a filter to reduce the risk of clogging and to promote water movement between soil and pipe. Water consumption is greater for subirrigation than for sprinkler irrigation, partly because some leakage into the surrounding area is unavoidable and partly because a certain quantity of water is required to elevate the watertable. The water used must be relatively free from suspended substances and salts. It must also be relatively free from organic material, which leads to bacteria1 growth in the pipe system and reduces its functioning. Because of this, waste water is less suitable for subirrigation. Subirrigation can be carried out in three ways: a) constant watertable during the growing season b) the watertable is allowed to fluctuate between certain pre-determined levels c) the watertable is elevated at the start of the growing season, after which the crop roots follow the sinking water level (requires deep rooting). Of these, the last method demands least labour and energy inputs but, if the site is suitable, all three methods are more effective than conventional methods.

Authors/Creators:Alinder, Staffan
Title:Alternativa bevattningsformer
Subtitle:2. reglering av grundvattennivån
Series Name/Journal:Report / Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Soil Sciences, Division of Agricultural Hydrotechnics
Year of publishing :1986
Number of Pages:58
Place of Publication:Uppsala
Publisher:Institutionen för markvetenskap, Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet
ISBN for printed version:91-576-2788-6
Publication Type:Report
Full Text Status:Public
Subjects:Obsolete subject words > FORESTRY, AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES and LANDSCAPE PLANNING > Soil science
Keywords:Bevattningsformer, Underbevattning, Reglering av grundvattennivå
Permanent URL:
ID Code:3723
Department:(NL, NJ) > Dept. of Soil Sciences (until 081001) > Div. of Hydrotechnics
Deposited By: Anna Nilsson
Deposited On:06 May 2009 00:00
Metadata Last Modified:02 Dec 2014 10:24

Repository Staff Only: item control page


Downloads per year (since September 2012)

View more statistics